Sep 28, 2022
Schaun Wheeler

How many different timing preferences could users really have?

Sep 28, 2022
Schaun Wheeler

How many different timing preferences could users really have?

Sep 28, 2022
Schaun Wheeler

How many different timing preferences could users really have?

Sep 28, 2022
Schaun Wheeler

How many different timing preferences could users really have?

We wrote recently about the importance of getting the timing of a message right. This short post uses data from one of our customers' actual messages to show what we mean by that. 

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. This one is worth hundreds of thousands of active users:

To conduct this analysis, we mined the history of our “personalization scores”. 

Personalization scores are how Aampe records user preferences, so for every possible change you could make to a message—whether sending on a different day, or at a different time, or with different content—every user in the system gets a score that estimates that specific user’s probability of responding positively to that choice. 

The chart above shows the top 40 patterns of “strong” preference (users who scored in the top third of the personalization score index for one or more message timing slots), and the bigger the dot, the more users showed that preference. 

  • The very top row was a relatively large number of users who only like to get messages on Tuesdays—but not late night on Tuesday

  • The next row is a big group of users who only want messages on Sundays. 

  • The row after that is a group that wants messages on Tuesdays, but not in the evening—not even early evening. 

  • The next row after that is a group of users who are good with pretty much any time we want to send them something.

You can see there are a bunch of groups who are good with almost all times, but who really don’t respond during a few key windows, and there’s another group that’s only ok with Monday mornings, and another that’s only ok with lunchtime on Wednesdays.

Also note the note at the bottom of the plot: There are 482 other timing preference patterns that we didn’t try to show, because it was too much to fit into one picture. 

Those 482 other preference groups, however, represent a full third of the user base.

In other words, there are hundreds, sometimes thousands, of preference patterns you need to take into account if you want to send each user a message at a time when they’re likely to act on it (and if you want to not send a user a message at a time that annoys them). 

You just can’t manage all of these different timing patterns by hand. 

Thankfully, you don’t have to.

Email hello@aampe.com, and give Aampe a test drive today.

0

Related

Shaping the future of marketing with Aampe through innovation, data.

Jun 16, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Discover how Aampe's agents employ causal analysis to accurately measure user engagement outcomes, even when influenced by external messages. By isolating the effects of their own actions from other variables, Aampe ensures precise attribution and effective decision-making in a complex messaging environment.

Jun 16, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Discover how Aampe's agents employ causal analysis to accurately measure user engagement outcomes, even when influenced by external messages. By isolating the effects of their own actions from other variables, Aampe ensures precise attribution and effective decision-making in a complex messaging environment.

Jun 16, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Discover how Aampe's agents employ causal analysis to accurately measure user engagement outcomes, even when influenced by external messages. By isolating the effects of their own actions from other variables, Aampe ensures precise attribution and effective decision-making in a complex messaging environment.

Jun 16, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Discover how Aampe's agents employ causal analysis to accurately measure user engagement outcomes, even when influenced by external messages. By isolating the effects of their own actions from other variables, Aampe ensures precise attribution and effective decision-making in a complex messaging environment.

Jun 10, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore how agentic systems define and execute decisions. This article delves into the five key decision types—Go/No-Go, Context, Creative Policy, Item Recommendation, and Freshness—that guide autonomous agents in delivering personalized user experiences. Learn how these systems prioritize meaningful choices to enhance engagement and effectiveness.

Jun 10, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore how agentic systems define and execute decisions. This article delves into the five key decision types—Go/No-Go, Context, Creative Policy, Item Recommendation, and Freshness—that guide autonomous agents in delivering personalized user experiences. Learn how these systems prioritize meaningful choices to enhance engagement and effectiveness.

Jun 10, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore how agentic systems define and execute decisions. This article delves into the five key decision types—Go/No-Go, Context, Creative Policy, Item Recommendation, and Freshness—that guide autonomous agents in delivering personalized user experiences. Learn how these systems prioritize meaningful choices to enhance engagement and effectiveness.

Jun 10, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore how agentic systems define and execute decisions. This article delves into the five key decision types—Go/No-Go, Context, Creative Policy, Item Recommendation, and Freshness—that guide autonomous agents in delivering personalized user experiences. Learn how these systems prioritize meaningful choices to enhance engagement and effectiveness.

Jun 5, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore Aampe's innovative approach to personalization, combining classical recommender systems for item selection with real-time reinforcement learning agents for dynamic message composition. Learn how this dual-path strategy enhances user engagement and content relevance.

Jun 5, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore Aampe's innovative approach to personalization, combining classical recommender systems for item selection with real-time reinforcement learning agents for dynamic message composition. Learn how this dual-path strategy enhances user engagement and content relevance.

Jun 5, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore Aampe's innovative approach to personalization, combining classical recommender systems for item selection with real-time reinforcement learning agents for dynamic message composition. Learn how this dual-path strategy enhances user engagement and content relevance.

Jun 5, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore Aampe's innovative approach to personalization, combining classical recommender systems for item selection with real-time reinforcement learning agents for dynamic message composition. Learn how this dual-path strategy enhances user engagement and content relevance.

Jun 3, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore why focusing solely on short-term metrics like lift can be misleading when assessing adaptive systems, and discover alternative approaches for meaningful evaluation.

Jun 3, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore why focusing solely on short-term metrics like lift can be misleading when assessing adaptive systems, and discover alternative approaches for meaningful evaluation.

Jun 3, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore why focusing solely on short-term metrics like lift can be misleading when assessing adaptive systems, and discover alternative approaches for meaningful evaluation.

Jun 3, 2025

Schaun Wheeler

Explore why focusing solely on short-term metrics like lift can be misleading when assessing adaptive systems, and discover alternative approaches for meaningful evaluation.

Load More

Load More

Load More

Load More